Surely we have a right to freedom if we have done no wrong? Surely we have a right not to be attacked if we have not hurt other people and do not threaten to do so? What's wrong with freedom? What's wrong with leaving people alone, until they have done a crime or there is some other reason to suspect that they might be a physical threat to others...
Violence begs the question, it does not offer any rationale in the sense that the use of force is arbitrary. It begs the question if there doesn't need to be a reason. Taxes are aggressive.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment